Executive Summary: As generative AI permeates the global workforce, a counter-intuitive phenomenon has emerged: instead of the promised leisure, we are witnessing ‘work intensification.’ While task speed increases, the volume of coordination, oversight, and cognitive switching has expanded to fill the void. For Singapore—a nation already grappling with high productivity demands—this shift requires a fundamental recalibration of management, moving away from ‘output volume’ toward ‘value-added judgment’ to prevent a systemic burnout of the professional class.
The Great Compression
The promise was simple, almost pastoral. We were told that the arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) and autonomous agents would act as a digital tide, lifting the heavy cargo of mundane admin and leaving us with a sun-drenched beach of creative thought. In the glass-fronted offices of Raffles Place and the tech hubs of One-North, the narrative was embraced with typical Singaporean pragmatism. If a report that once took five hours now takes five minutes, the logic went, we have regained four hours and fifty-five minutes of "strategic thinking time."
However, a walk through the CBD at 7:00 PM reveals a different reality. The lights in the skyscrapers aren't dimming any earlier. If anything, the pulse of the city feels more frantic. The "Efficiency Paradox" has arrived: AI doesn't reduce work; it intensifies it.
The Harvard Business Review recently highlighted that as AI lowers the "cost" of producing a unit of work (an email, a slide deck, a line of code), the organizational response isn't to rest. It is to demand more units. We are witnessing a hardening of the workday—a compression where every "buffer" moment of the day is being colonised by more AI-generated tasks.
The Mechanics of Intensification
The Treadmill of Hyper-Production
In the pre-AI era, the friction of human creation acted as a natural speed governor. It took time to research, draft, and iterate. This friction allowed for "cognitive breathing room." Today, that friction has evaporated.
When a junior analyst at a Singaporean VC firm uses AI to synthesise fifty market reports in an hour, the senior partner doesn't give them the rest of the afternoon off. Instead, the partner asks for a synthesis of a hundred reports, or worse, demands five different "scenario versions" of the same analysis. We are producing more "stuff," but the cognitive load of reviewing, verifying, and connecting that "stuff" remains a purely human burden. In Singapore’s high-stakes professional environment, this translates to a relentless treadmill where the speed is set to 'Sprint' indefinitely.
The Verification Burden
There is a hidden tax on AI productivity: the cost of distrust. Because LLMs are prone to hallucinations and "confident errors," the worker has transitioned from a creator to an editor.
Psychologically, editing is often more draining than creating. It requires a state of hyper-vigilance. You are no longer flowing with your own ideas; you are policing the machine’s output. For a legal associate in a firm at Marina Bay Financial Centre, the AI might draft a contract in seconds, but the next three hours are spent in a high-stress hunt for the one hallucinated clause that could ruin a client’s merger. The work hasn't disappeared; it has merely changed shape, becoming denser and more anxiety-ridden.
The Singapore Context: Smart Nation or Stressed Nation?
Singapore presents a unique case study for work intensification. As a nation with no natural resources other than its people, productivity is not just an economic metric; it is a survival strategy. The government’s "Smart Nation" initiative has done a stellar job of subsidising AI adoption, but we must now look at the human cost of this digital acceleration.
The Cultural Premium on 'Being Busy'
In Singaporean corporate culture, visibility has traditionally been equated with value. The "kiasu" (fear of losing out) mentality, while a driver of excellence, becomes a liability in an AI-driven world. If your colleague is using AI to produce triple the output, you feel a cultural compulsion to quadruple yours. This leads to a "Red Queen’s Race"—running faster and faster just to stay in the same place.
The Singaporean Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has consistently advocated for work-life harmony, yet AI is blurring the boundaries further. When work can be done instantly on a smartphone via a mobile-optimised LLM, the "office" follows the worker into the MRT, the hawker centre, and the home. The "always-on" culture is no longer just a choice; it is an architectural feature of the AI era.
The SME Struggle
While MNCs have the luxury of dedicated AI ethics and wellness officers, Singapore's Heartland SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises) face a different pressure. For a local accounting firm in Toa Payoh, AI is seen as a way to cut costs and "do more with less." However, without a shift in business models, these firms risk burning out their best talent. If a firm charges by the hour but uses AI to do the work in minutes, they face a revenue crisis. The knee-jerk reaction is to pile on more clients, further intensifying the workload for the human staff who must still manage the client relationships and the final "human touch."
From Volume to Value: A New Management Manifesto
To survive the intensification of work, Singaporean leaders must abandon the "Industrial Age" mindset of measuring output volume. If AI can produce infinite volume, volume becomes worthless. The new currency is judgment.
Redefining the 'Standard Workday'
We need to move toward a "Judgment-Based" evaluation system. In this model, a worker is not rewarded for the 500 emails they sent with AI assistance, but for the three critical decisions they made that steered a project toward success.
Imagine a Singapore where "Productivity" is measured by the reduction of noise. A truly productive AI-enabled manager is one who uses the tech to filter out the irrelevant, leaving their team with a clear, calm space to do the deep work that machines cannot—empathy, complex negotiation, and ethical reasoning.
The 'Right to Disconnect' in an Automated World
As AI makes work instantaneous, the "Response Time" expectations in Singaporean business need a radical reset. We should consider a "Digital Quietude" protocol, where certain hours are cordoned off from the AI-generated flood. If an AI can draft an email at 2:00 AM, it doesn't mean a human should read it at 2:01 AM.
The Social Fabric: Observations from the Ground
Walking through the Tanjong Pagar district at lunch hour, one sees the "AI-intensified" worker. They are the ones with a salad in one hand and a phone in the other, likely prompting an agent to summarise a meeting they are currently missing. There is a palpable sense of "information obesity"—too much data, too little time to digest it.
Even in our leisure, the intensification follows us. AI-driven recommendation engines at Jewel Changi Airport or on our Grab apps curate our choices so efficiently that we lose the "slow time" of discovery. We are becoming a society of "optimizers," but we must ask: what are we optimizing for? If the end goal is simply more work, we have missed the point of the technology entirely.
The Economic Implications for Singapore
If Singapore does not solve the intensification problem, it faces a looming talent crisis. The younger generation—Gen Z and Gen Alpha—are increasingly resistant to the "hustle culture" of their parents. If AI is used as a tool to extract more "juice" from the human orange, the most talented individuals will simply leave the traditional workforce to join the "solopreneur" economy, where they can control their own AI-work-tempo.
Conversely, if Singapore can lead the world in "Human-Centric AI Management," it will become the global destination for top-tier talent. The goal should be to create a "High-Value, Low-Friction" economy. This means using AI not to squeeze more hours out of the day, but to make the existing hours more meaningful.
Strategic Solutions: A Path Forward
1. The Audit of Meaning
Companies should conduct an "AI Work Audit." Instead of asking "How much time did AI save us?", they should ask "What new tasks did we create to fill that saved time?" If the new tasks are just "busy work," they should be ruthlessly eliminated.
2. Cognitive Load Management
Singaporean HR departments must begin treating "Cognitive Load" as a health and safety issue, similar to how physical strain is treated in the construction sector. AI tools should come with "fatigue warnings" or forced downtime to ensure that the human "editor" is performing at their peak.
3. The Education Pivot
Our institutes of higher learning, from NUS to SMU, must pivot from teaching "execution" to teaching "curation." When execution is free, curation is priceless. Students need to learn how to stand back from the machine and see the big picture—the very thing that the "intensified" worker is too busy to see.
Key Practical Takeaways
Shift from Output to Outcome: Stop measuring how many reports are produced and start measuring the business impact of the decisions derived from them.
Enforce Cognitive Buffers: Explicitly schedule "No-AI" blocks in the workday to allow for reflection and deep thinking, preventing the "hardening" of the schedule.
Prioritize Verification Skills: Train staff specifically in the art of AI auditing. Recognizing a "confident lie" from an AI is a high-level skill that requires focused attention, not a distracted glance between other tasks.
Adopt "Batch Processing" for AI Tasks: Avoid the "instant response" trap. Just because an AI can generate a response in seconds doesn't mean it should be sent or reviewed immediately.
Redesign Incentives: Reward employees who use AI to shorten their workday while maintaining quality, rather than those who use it to expand their scope of work to unsustainable levels.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does AI actually make us less productive?
In a narrow sense, no—it increases the volume of output. However, in a broader sense, it can decrease systemic productivity by creating a flood of low-value information that requires high-value human time to filter, verify, and manage, leading to burnout and strategic errors.
How is work intensification different from just being busy?
Being "busy" often involves a mix of high-effort and low-effort tasks. "Intensification" is the removal of low-effort tasks (the "easy" parts of your job) and replacing them with high-stakes editing and decision-making. This means every minute of the workday becomes cognitively demanding, with no mental recovery time.
What can Singaporean SMEs do to avoid this trap?
SMEs should move away from cost-plus or hourly billing models toward value-based pricing. By decoupling "time spent" from "value delivered," firms can use AI to complete work faster and allow employees to reclaim that time, rather than feeling forced to take on more volume to maintain revenue.
No comments:
Post a Comment